Book 987 Roberto Bolano – 2666

I have been staring at my computer screen, trying my hardest to summarise Roberto Bolano’s posthumous work, 2666 and trust me it’s mighty difficult as it’s plotlines cross and reoccur like a Tarantino film script.

The book is divided into five parts and the whole thing revolves the Mexican city of Santa Teresa (basically it’s Ciudad Juarez, where over 200 murders of women took place). It also features a mysterious writer called Benno Von Archimboldi and not only that there’s a menage a quatres, an insane intellectual, a sports journalist PLUS tips on how to barbeque meat properly,Duchamp, different phobias and the myth of Sisyphus and we are still scraping the surface.

Mainly I see it as a novel about death and the devolution of the human being. Killings and murders do feature prominently so I assume that i’m correct. But, as I said before there much more. How about the plight of being a writer or the problems of war??

Eventually, in the fifth part everything is tied up and that is when the novel makes sense.

Bolano’s characters all have an evil streak to them and contain no redeeming factors whatsoever. Despite this onslaught of pessimism, 2666 is a momentous novel. Dazzling and intelligent from beginning to end. However I admit I have never read such a frustrating, mind boggling, meandering book either (at least Pynchon’s novels all return to their focal point. 2666 just keeps on opening loose end after loose end)

It is not easy but VERY rewarding, especially when you reach the fifth book. Novel of the decade? oh yes definitely. NOTHING will come close to this.


2 thoughts on “Book 987 Roberto Bolano – 2666

  1. Trevor March 30, 2009 / 7:11 pm

    I find it interesting that you found everything tied up in the fifth part. I certainly didn’t! I felt that that part ended with just as many or more questions and open trails as the other parts. But for all that, the book has stuck with me like no other in years. I find myself obsessed trying to make sense of it.

    • deucekindred March 30, 2009 / 7:35 pm

      *spoiler alert*

      I know what you mean but at least we discover these things in the fifth part

      How Archimboldi got his his name
      The Klaus/Santa Teresa Connection
      How the characters in the part about the critics are connected to Archimboldi

      Had Bolano finished the novel im sure things would have been uncovered but this is mere speculation. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s